The core of the EU social pillars

The always growing numeral of storytellers

In all known human religions, there have been traces of ritual sacrifice. It can’t be coincidental, but we can’t know anything about the reasons since we do not know the context. However, we can make our thesis and guestimates, together with what we know about the life of for example the Mammut hunters.

If we consider the evolution of mankind, and of course the women as well, as rational and try to find a rational explanation to sacrifices.

But what we know for sure about the human rase is that some of us are lazier than others.

Consider the hunter when he has killed a Mammut of 7 tonnes. He and his family could eat fresh meat for about 3-4 days if in summer. In wintertime they could probably save meat for a longer time, but the colossus would be deep frozen faster than they could split the meat to manageable pieces. To share the meat with other hunters might be of importance for survival since the luck of hunting might not be evenly distributed. Hence the sacrifice might be an important development of the human genome for survival.

But what we know for sure about the human rase is that some of us are lazier than others. There must have been people who did not bother to hunt, just stroll around eating of the Mammut the hunting part of the population supplied. The socialism was invented.

The aim to distribute wealth evenly, to yourself, with a minimum of effort appears to be the core in all those narratives.

The number of people not hunting increased since they were not exposed for the dangers during the hunt. They had more time for sex, where the evolution theory gives us the conclusion that they prevail, at least into a certain equilibrium.

The trick is when the lazy people become numerous, to fool the hunters to accept the situation. Since the people not hunting have a lot of spare time, they invent things that is invisible and abstract. Such things as religions, political ideologies, economy, tax laws, financial advicers and real estate brokers, beside different kinds of doom atmosphere. The invention of tax laws made it possible to fool the hunters to feed you, even since the hunter and his family was starving.

Is there anything in common with, Socialism, Communism, Social Democratic ideology and the EU social pillars? The aim to distribute wealth evenly, to yourself, with a minimum of effort appears to be the core in all those narratives.

The socialism and communism have invented the capitalism as their evil antipode.

The ideologies are built on the same fundament. The poor, the evil, the masses (the proletariat), and the ones who are not mentioned.

Political ideologies such as socialism is difficult to analyse since the theory is slippering around between the different artefacts. The best way is to try to find the opposite.

The socialism and communism have invented the capitalism as their evil antipode. If we try to define what capitalism is. All people have abilities. All people are stimulated by deploying their abilities. Most people are stimulated by enhancing their abilities hence there will be differences between people with regards to abilities, and what they can achieve.

The next invention by the socialist dogma is the poor. It is kind of a noble state to be poor. The poorer the better.

The capitalist has something the socialist don’t, hence he or she is a bad person according to the dogma. All resources are supposed to be evenly distributed. The simple fact of the theory is that the one who has something has stolen from the masses (the proletariat). The one who does not spend everything they “got distributed immediately, becomes a capitalist.

For the socialist there is a given amount of wealth to distribute. When JK Rawling writes her Harry Potter stories, earning a fortune when 450 million people reads her books, she is stealing wealth from the poor. The world would be a much better place to live in without Harry Potter. To achieve this state of justice required, it is better if some clerks in the state academy writes all books.

When the masses become poor because of the tax level, the poor is sliding over to women, coloured, transsexual, disabled or whatever minority needed for the polarisation concept.

The next invention by the socialist dogma is the poor. It is kind of a noble state to be poor. The poorer the better. The poor is best in comparison with a capitalist. The poor is mainly a minority. When the masses become poor because of the tax level, the poor is sliding over to women, coloured, transsexual, disabled or whatever minority needed for the polarisation concept.

Hence the socialism requires an elite to educate the masses.

The masses (the proletariat) might don’t want to give away what they have achieved by hard work, exercising their skill over and over again to improve their achievements. Or self implemented austerity to invest in an idea they believe in. Hence the socialism requires an elite to educate the masses. Marx and Engels were not poor, proletarians, or mine workers. Nor are the EU bureaucrats. They belonged to wealthy upper class, like most of the socialistic agitators of our time.

Sweden might be as close to the socialistic utopia as it is possible to reach before the state of famine. There is a trend among Swedish gifted youths. They try to be diagnosed with a severe psychiatric disability like bipolarity or schizophrenia, to be guaranteed a life on benefits. They make their calculations and summarize that they will never manage to achieve in the Swedish socialistic system. They put their effort to dig into some severe disability, learn the right answers to the screening questions provided by the specialists framed in the socialistic Swedish universities.

Go back »